Fast FAQs: Learning about life
What do university students need to know about biology?
Whitehead Member Hazel Sive, who was appointed associated dean of MIT's School of Science this summer, considers how we teach life sciences now—and what's coming.
How is the teaching of biology
changing?

Whitehead Member Hazel Sive, who was appointed associate dean of MIT’s School
of Science this summer, considers how we teach life sciences now—
and what’s coming.
Photo: Furnald/Gray
|
What has really emerged in the last twenty years is the sense that biology
isn’t an isolated subject. That’s certainly been recognized
since the dawn of molecular biology in the ’40s and the ’50s,
but that sense really did not permeate biology education for a while. And
what’s happened, and what’s happening, is that the connection
between biology and the other disciplines has become very strong. Biology
has permeated every other topic at MIT.
There are very strong intellectual bridges, research bridges and teaching
bridges built between biology and other departments. This is a trend that
only will strengthen.
In the future, you may not come to MIT to study biology per se. It may be
that you will come here to study biophysics or biochemistry or bioethics.
You will focus more on specific areas of biology because biology itself is
so big.
How can you best teach such a vast
and rapidly growing subject?
That’s an interesting question. We teach one semester of
introductory biology, and what I do in my course is get rid of all
history. There’s what we know, and what we’re trying
to know, and what the current challenges are.
But we touch on a very small part of biology in our course. And there
is a real question as to whether it’s enough. We’ve
thought about having a second semester, elective rather than
required, that would be advanced introductory biology.
Why should every MIT student learn about biology?
There are a few good reasons that biology is a general Institute requirement.
One is that the current estimate is that 40 percent of all MIT research
is biology-based. So the students who sit in my class need the background.
And I’ll make a prediction that 70 percent of our students will, at
some point, do something in their careers that touches on biology, no matter
what major they take.
Another part is that the moment they become MIT students they are spokespeople
for science, within their own families and within their own communities. People
will ask them questions, and they need to be informed.
And then I always throw in for my students that this is really cool stuff, and
this is about you. It’s fascinating to think that you came from a single cell.
What do undergraduates learn in the lab?
Eight-five percent of our students participate in lab research at some point during
their three years as biology majors. Those students get training in how to design
experiments, how to test hypotheses, how to think logically in a practical kind of
way. It’s a very powerful program.
Students are strongly encouraged to stay in a lab for a minimum of two semesters, or
a summer and a semester. We really encourage students to go deep into one lab rather
than to get a smattering of how things work. The idea is to learn how to do research,
and you can’t do that if you’re just sampling. We want them to get
into the kitchen and figure out how to make the food on the table, not just arrange
it on the plate and maybe eat some of it.
Are methods of teaching changing?
For me, the one-on-one conversation, without any electronic devices, except to
augment information, is the heart of pedagogy, and I never want that to change.
The Internet clearly can, and has done, an enormous amount of good. It’s
so easy to look something up now. It used to be so arduous. And that’s
fantastic. It helps with my lectures; it lets my students get to know
what’s out there.
But I’m a believer in using information to help thinking, not substituting
information from the Internet.
I have a radical idea for MIT: we turn off the Internet for three hours a day.
That would encourage our students, especially our undergraduates, to go back to
old-fashioned mechanisms of communicating that involve conversations and sitting
down and thinking things through in a quiet manner that is not intruded upon by
music or flashing things or other input from the Internet.
Are we recruiting the right number of students to do biomedical research?
One does look at the huge number of buildings going up, and wonder where all
those research scientists will come from, and what they’ll do, and who
will fund them. On the other hand, there’s a lot of information that
needs to be gathered, and we need people to gather it.
|